Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of GOG phases 3 randomized clinical trials for women with recurrent or advanced cervical cancer. GOG Protocols 169, 179, 204, 240 and JGOG 0505

From: Breaking down the evidence for bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer: past, present and future

 

GOG 169 [70]

GOG 179 [71]

GOG 204 [5]

GOG 240 [57]

JGOG 0505 [6]

Modalities

Cis ± Pac

Cis ± Topo

Cis-Pac

Ctx vs Ctx + bevacizumab

CDDP-Pac vs CB-Pac

   

vs Cis- Topo

  
   

vs Cis- GC

  
   

vs Cis-VR

  

Stage

IVB, recurrent, or persistent SCC

IVB, recurrent, or persistent SCC

IVB, recurrent, or persistent SCC, ACA, or ASC

IVB, recurrent, or persistent SCC, ACA, or ASC

IVB, recurrent, or persistent SCC, ACA, or ASC

N

264

293

513

452

253

PS

0–2

0–2

0–1

0–1

0–2

ORR

19 vs 36 %

13 vs 27 %

29.1 vs 23.4 vs 22.3 vs 25.9 %

36 vs 48 %

-

PFS

2.8 vs 4.8 mo

2.9 vs 4.6 mo

5.8 vs 4.6 vs 4.7 vs 3.9 mo

5.9 vs 8.2 mo

6.9 vs 6.21

P value

<001

NS

.06 vs .04 vs .19

.002

.004

OS

8.8 vs 9.7 mo

6.5 vs 9.4 mo

12.8 vs 10.2 vs 10.3 vs 9.9 mo

13.3 vs 17 mo

18.3 vs 17.5 mo

P value

NS

.021

.71 vs .90 vs .89

.004

.032

  1. JGOG Japanese Gynecologic oncology group; Cis cisplatin; Pac paclitaxel; Topo topotecan; GC gemcitabine; VR vinorelbine, CB carboplatin; SCC squamous cell carcinoma; ACA adenocarcinoma; ASC adenosquamous carcinoma; N numbers; PS performance status; ORR overall response rate; HR hazard ratio; mo months; PFS progression free survival; NS non significance; OS overall survival